Vertaling en analyse van woorden door kunstmatige intelligentie ChatGPT
Op deze pagina kunt u een gedetailleerde analyse krijgen van een woord of zin, geproduceerd met behulp van de beste kunstmatige intelligentietechnologie tot nu toe:
- hoe het woord wordt gebruikt
- gebruiksfrequentie
- het wordt vaker gebruikt in mondelinge of schriftelijke toespraken
- opties voor woordvertaling
- Gebruiksvoorbeelden (meerdere zinnen met vertaling)
- etymologie
Dostoevsky$506505$ - vertaling naar Engels
![A sketch of the Petrashevsky Circle [[mock execution]]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/B pokrovsky kazn 1849.jpg?width=200 "A sketch of the Petrashevsky Circle [[mock execution]]")
![Demons]]''](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Dostoyevsky The Demons Manuscript.jpg?width=200 "Demons]]''")
![Dostoevsky on his [[bier]], drawing by [[Ivan Kramskoi]], 1881](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Dostoyevsky on his Bier, Kramskoy.jpg?width=200 "Dostoevsky on his [[bier]], drawing by [[Ivan Kramskoi]], 1881")
![Dostoevsky monument in [[Dresden]] (Germany)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Dresden Dostojewski-Denkmal.JPG?width=200 "Dostoevsky monument in [[Dresden]] (Germany)")
![military engineer]]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Image dost 01.jpg?width=200 "military engineer]]")
).jpg?width=200 "Soviet Union stamp, 1971")
Wikipedia
"Dostoevsky and Parricide" (German: Dostojewski und die Vatertötung) is an introductory article contributed by Sigmund Freud to a scholarly collection on the 1880 novel The Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor Dostoyevsky. The collection was published in 1928. The article argues that it is no coincidence that some of the greatest works of world literature – including Oedipus Rex, Hamlet, as well as The Brothers Karamazov – all concern parricide, which in Dostoevsky's case Freud links to his epilepsy.
Ernest Jones termed the piece “Freud's last contribution to the psychology of literature and his most brilliant”; Freud himself however called it “this trivial essay. It was written as a favour for someone and written reluctantly”.
